Tag Archives: Egyptian Armed Forces

A step in the right direction

Egypt’s military eyes constitutional referendum


By Marwa Awad and Tom Perry

CAIRO (Reuters) – Egypt’s new military rulers have given indications of new moves to share power with civilians and rapidly to amend the constitution by popular referendum, opposition activists and a British minister said on Monday.

Wael Ghonim, a Google executive detained then released for his part in the uprising that overthrew President Hosni Mubarak, said members of the military council had told him a referendum would be held on constitutional amendments in two months.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said Egyptian Prime Minister Ahmed Shafik had told him that he would reshuffle his cabinet in the coming week to bring opposition figures into the line-up appointed by Mubarak last month.

Earlier, Egypt’s new military rulers urged workers to return to their jobs on Monday and help restart an economy damaged by the uprising which ended Mubarak’s 30-year rule but also sparked a growing wave of strikes.

In a televised address three days after Mubarak was forced to step down as president and hand power to the armed forces, the Higher Military Council appealed for national unity.

In “Communique No. 5” read out on state television, an army spokesman said: “Noble Egyptians see that these strikes, at this delicate time, lead to negative results.” It added that work stoppages were harming security and economic production.

The military council now governing the Arab world’s most populous nation said it “calls on citizens and professional unions and the labour unions to play their role fully”.

Egypt’s generals, who played an important role in the anti-Mubarak revolt by making no effort to crush it, are asserting their control and trying to return life to normal. They have pledged to supervise a transition to civilian rule.

Political analysts questioned how long it would take to amend the constitution, hold a referendum on the amendments and then hold the elections to the legislature and executive.

The comments by Ghonim and Hague indicated a willingness to move swiftly, though sceptics will want to see real action.

Should Russia, China worry? click http://link.reuters.com/byb97r

Protest timeline, click http://link.reuters.com/zyb97r

For graphics, click on http://r.reuters.com/nym77r

Interactive factbox, click http://link.reuters.com/puk87r

Pro-democracy leaders say Egyptians will demonstrate again if their demands for radical change are not met. They plan a big “Victory March” on Friday to celebrate the revolution — and perhaps to remind the military of the power of the street.

Using their new-found freedom of expression and protest, angry employees on Monday rallied in Cairo and other cities to complain about low pay and poor working conditions.

Protests, sit-ins and strikes have occurred at state-owned institutions across Egypt, including the stock exchange, textile and steel firms, media organisations, the postal service, railways, the Culture Ministry and the Health Ministry.

Workers cite a series of grievances. What unites them is a new sense of being able to speak out in the post-Mubarak era.


Hundreds of employees demonstrated outside a branch of the Bank of Alexandria in central Cairo on Monday, urging their bosses to “leave, leave!” in an echo of an anti-Mubarak slogan.

At least 500 people staged a wage protest outside the state television building.

The military cleared the last few dozen protesters from Cairo’s Tahrir Square, nerve-centre of anti-Mubarak protests.

But shortly after that, hundreds of police officers marched through to demonstrate solidarity with pro-democracy activists and again stopped traffic flowing through the city centre.

In a sign of nervousness, Egypt’s stock exchange, closed since Jan. 27 because of the turmoil, said it would remain shut until stability returned to the economy, an official said.

The military rulers called a bank holiday on Monday after disruption in the banking sector. Tuesday will be a national holiday to mark the Prophet Mohammad’s birthday.

In a communique on Sunday, the military suspended the constitution and dissolved parliament, moves welcomed by those who saw both as tailored to reinforcing Mubarak’s iron rule.

Egyptians generally respect the 470,000-strong military, which receives about $1.3 billion annually in U.S. aid and was shielded from public criticism or scrutiny in the Mubarak era. But some in the opposition still mistrust its intentions.

The top U.S. military officer voiced admiration on Monday for the way Egypt’s army had peacefully handled the power shift.

“I think they have handled this situation exceptionally well … it’s been done peacefully, and we have every expectation that that will continue,” Admiral Mike Mullen told Reuters during a visit to Israel.


Free and fair elections will be held under a revised constitution, the military said. But it gave no timetable beyond saying it would be in charge “for a temporary period of six months or until the end of elections to the upper and lower houses of parliament, and presidential elections”.

“The Egyptian regime is still there, still controlled by old generals,” said the political risk consultancy Stratfor, adding:

“They have promised democracy, but it is not clear that they mean it. If they mean it, it is not clear how they would do it, certainly not in a timeframe of a few months.”

As the “Revolution on the Nile” sent shockwaves around the Middle East, troubling global financial markets worried about oil supplies, there were clashes in both Bahrain and Yemen, neighbours of the world’s biggest oil exporter Saudi Arabia.

In Tehran, too, police fired teargas at demonstrators.

Algeria said on Monday a 19-year-old state of emergency there would be lifted in days, brushing off concerns that recent protests could escalate as in Tunisia and Egypt.

Egypt’s army said it would lift the country’s own hated state of emergency, implemented after the 1981 assassination of Mubarak’s predecessor Anwar Sadat by Islamist soldiers and kept in place by Mubarak to stifle dissent. It has yet to say when this will happen, troubling pro-democracy campaigners.

The cabinet, appointed by Mubarak last month to try to persuade protesters he was introducing a fresh team to introduce reforms, stays in place. It now reports to the army chiefs.


“The week began with an old soldier running Egypt. It ended with different old soldiers running Egypt with even more formal power than Mubarak had,” Stratfor said.

Any transition to democracy will be fraught with difficulty, and old ways of doing things may die hard in a country where the ruling party routinely rigged elections and candidates used bribery, hired thugs and dirty tricks to ensure victory.

Existing registered parties are mostly small, weak and fragmented. The Islamist Muslim Brotherhood, which under the now suspended constitution could not form a party, may be the best organised group but its true popularity has yet to be tested.

Its strength worries some in the United States, which backed Mubarak, as well as in Israel, for which Mubarak’s Egypt was an important ally in a predominantly hostile region.

The army has pledged to uphold Egypt’s international obligations, which include a peace treaty with Israel.

The widely loathed police were withdrawn from the streets on Jan. 28 after failing to crush protesters with batons, teargas, rubber bullets and live fire. The army stood by during those confrontations, without helping the protesters or the police.

There have been several police protests since Mubarak quit. On Monday in Tahrir, some complained about wages, others wanted immunity from prosecution over the policing of the revolt.

“We are with the people. We ask the people of Egypt not to ostracise us,” Lieutenant Mohammed Mestekawy told Reuters, as scuffles broke out between the marchers and bystanders.

“I do not believe them. Where were they when my brother was killed by thugs?” cried Samah Hassan, who picked a fight with one officer as the marchers headed to the Interior Ministry.

“They are free riders,” she shouted. “They want to claim the revolution for themselves. They are agents.”




The next steps for Egypt….???

Behind White House applause for Egypt’s protesters, unanswered questions, uncertain future

By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON – The United States faces an intensely uncertain future in Egypt, a stalwart ally of decades in the volatile Middle East, where key tenets of American foreign policy are now thrown into doubt.

Behind President Barack Obama’s praise for Egypt’s protesters and the outcome they achieved lie major unanswered questions about what will come next now that President Hosni Mubarak has been overthrown after 30 years of authoritarian rule. For many people in Egypt, they were years of oppression, corruption and poverty; but for the U.S., Mubarak was an anchor of stability at the helm of the world’s largest Arab nation, enforcing a peace treaty with Israel and protecting vital U.S. interests, including passage for oil through the Suez Canal.

For now, the military is in charge, but whether, when or how a transition will be made to the kind of democratic society that meets the protesters’ demands remains unknown. Speaking at the White House on Friday, Obama acknowledged difficult days ahead and unanswered questions but expressed confidence that the answers will be found.

Most tellingly, as the U.S. warily eyes the days ahead, Obama singled out the Egyptian military for praise in the restraint it showed through more than two weeks of largely peaceful protests. But the president emphasized the military’s role as a “caretaker” leading up to elections now set for September and said it must now “ensure a transition that is credible in the eyes of the Egyptian people.”

He said that means lifting Egypt’s hated 30-year-old “emergency” police powers laws, protecting the rights of citizens, revising the country’s law and constitution “to make this change irreversible and laying out a clear path to elections that are fair and free.”

But just as the U.S. had limited influence during the uprising that seemed to spring almost out of nowhere to overtake Egypt, it has limited influence over what happens next. The U.S. provides some $1.5 billion a year in aid to Egypt, the vast majority of it to the military, and has a good relationship with the Egyptian military, which often sends officers here for training. That doesn’t guarantee a commanding U.S. role.

“Do we have leverage or influence?” asked Aaron David Miller, a former Mideast adviser to six U.S. secretaries of state. “Well, did we have leverage and influence over the past few weeks? That’s highly arguable.”

Miller, now with the Woodrow Wilson Center think-tank , said it will take weeks or months to sort things out. And in the end, he said, “I think Egypt will be a far less forgiving place for American interests as democracy takes root — if in fact it does.”

Asked about the uncertainty ahead, especially with respect to the role of the military, presidential spokesman Robert Gibbs could only answer: “I don’t think we have to fear democracy.”

Beyond the question of who will end up in control in Egypt and whether the U.S. will still be able to count the country as a firm and stable ally, there are concerns over whether the unrest that brought down Mubarak will spread to other nations in the Middle East, including oil-rich autocratic neighbours.

That prospect looms even as the U.S. handling of the Egypt situation has angered some leaders in the region who thought Washington was too quick to abandon Mubarak — although Obama and his administration studiously avoided ever calling outright for the president’s ouster.

On Friday, after Mubarak’s resignation was announced, Obama was able to give fuller expression to his views.

“By stepping down, President Mubarak responded to the Egyptian people’s hunger for change,” Obama said, in words reminiscent of his own presidential campaign.

Of the protesters, the president said: “This is the power of human dignity, and it can never be denied.” He compared them to the Germans who tore down the Berlin Wall and to independence leader Mohandas K. Gandhi‘s nonviolent ranks in India.

Mubarak’s resignation came less than 24 hours after he’d surprised the White House and many others by delivering a defiant speech Thursday in which he refused to step down, confounding widespread expectations that he’d do so. Obama learned of the announcement of his resignation Friday morning when an aide brought him a note during a meeting in the Oval Office.

Then he spent a few moments, along with the rest of the world, watching the joyous celebrations in Cairo on TV.

“Egyptians have inspired us, and they’ve done so by putting the lie to the idea that justice is best gained through violence,” Obama said. “For in Egypt, it was the moral force of nonviolence — not terrorism, not mindless killing — but nonviolence, moral force that bent the arc of history toward justice once more.”

The protests arose in a country with enormous social problems, with vast differences between the haves and the have-nots. It is a country where more than 50 per cent of the adult population is illiterate and some 40 per cent live below or close to the poverty line. Rising costs of food were among the leading factors underpinning the protests. Some of the impoverished Egyptians are beneficiaries of U.S. food aid; officials said Friday that U.S. aid to Egypt was not expected to be affected by Mubarak’s departure.

It was not clear what role Islamic militant groups such as the now-banned Muslim Brotherhood might play in the new government that emerges. Egypt’s ruling military on Saturday moved to resolve one area of uncertainty by reassuring its international allies that there would be no break in its landmark 1979 peace deal with Israel.

The top U.S. military officer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen, will be in Israel on Sunday and Monday, with developments in Egypt expected to be at the top of the agenda. The meeting was previously scheduled. Mullen is also visiting Jordan, another Mideast ally facing the prospect of civil unrest.